GEMS in art

By Roxanne Gleave and Audrey Dewjee

Why ‘GEMS’?

On one of the Zoom events we attended during 2021 someone pointed out that, globally, white people are in a minority and that it is non-white people who form the global ethnic majority (GEM). We have got so used to (and become conditioned into) talking in terms of the ‘ethnic minority’ or, possibly, ‘black and minority ethnic’, that it is easy to forget the global context. We liked the idea and in this article we are going to unashamedly use ‘GEM’ as a reminder of this global reality.

GEMS in art

Awareness that there has been a black presence in Britain since at least Roman times has been growing gradually but, if we are challenged, what evidence can we produce?

Audrey Dewjee’s research into the early black presence in north Wales is documented in an article on this site [1]https://www.historycalroots.com/discovering-black-history-in-wales/, whilst for his many articles for us, John Ellis has drawn together records from a number of sources to identify the black presence in the Royal Navy and British Army in the 18th and 19th centuries.[2]If you type ‘ellis’ into this site’s ‘search’ box John’s articles will come up

Another way, of course, is to diligently trawl through parish records as people like Kathleen Chater have done [3]Untold Histories – Black people in England and Wales during the period of the British slave trade, c.1660-1807, Kathleen Chater, Manchester University Press, 2011. Kathleen is an outstanding example, there are numerous others who have adopted the same approach to identify examples of an early black presence in Britain.

The authors of this article have long been in the habit when going round museums and art galleries of looking for evidence of a black presence. It can be a dispiriting experience as, often, wall after wall is filled with portraits of white people or group scenes with no black representation at all. But there are examples to be spotted.

This article is about GEMS in art and offers just a few examples of black people being depicted in art. We are not art historians, our aim is simply to show that black people have been present in Britain for centuries and that, sometimes, that presence was captured in the art of the day.

Who? What? Where? When?

Having scoured the gallery and finally identified the portrayal of a black person, in many cases, there is an immediate sense of frustration because they are, often but not always, not the main character in the scene; they are in the shadows, at the edges of the frame and, hence, anonymous. So, we may not know who they are, we cannot (with some exceptions) talk about them as personalities, but their mere presence, the fact they are there at all, depicted in a painting, is evidence of a black presence in the society they inhabited.

We may not know their names but we can deduce something about what they did from the role they are depicted in. Many are very obviously servants, literally subservient and therefore reliant on the whim of their employer; but it is worth remembering that the life of a servant could be relatively secure compared to other working class people who might live their lives in, or on the brink of, destitution. But there are others in roles such as: groom, looking after horses, trumpeter in a grand pageant, or military personnel either in the Army or the Royal Navy. They are depicted in these roles because these are the roles performed by black people in society at large. We don’t need to simply assume this, it is something that we can confirm from documentary evidence.

Paintings can also tell us about where black people lived and can give the lie to the common misconception that black people were only present in cities or large towns. There are pictures, for instance, of black grooms attending their master’s horses on the great country estates. Black men (it was usually men) who lived on a country estate would have played their part in the life of the local community, for instance by attending church, and possibly marrying a local woman and establishing a family.

Finally, the dates of paintings tell us when there was a black presence. The earliest example we will use in this article dates from the 16th century.

The sixteenth century

In her book, Black Tudors,[4]’Black Tudors – the untold story’, Miranda Kaufmann, Oneworld Publication, 2017 Miranda Kauffmann identifies dozens of people described as ‘moors’ or ‘blackamoors’ during Tudor times, she writes ‘In 1560, Sir John Young of Bristol had an African gardener, as did Sir Henry Bromley of Holt, Worcestershire, in 1607 … Grace Robinson, a blackamoor, worked as a laundress alongside John Morockoe, a blackamoor, in the kitchen and scullery for Richard Sackville, the third Earl of Dorset, at Knole in Kent between 1613 and 1624.’[5]ibid p.102 One of these ‘black Tudors’, John Blanke, is depicted in a painting.

Dating from 1511, this is part of a pictorial record that Henry VIII had made of a grand tournament to mark the birth of a male child who, as it turned out, only survived for a few weeks. Henry commissioned the Westminster Tournament Roll, a unique treasure held at the College of Arms in London.

It is a pictorial illuminated manuscript, a continuous roll approximately 60 feet long. It is a narrative of the beginning, middle and end of the tournament, which took place over two days.

One of the trumpeters is clearly black and researchers have been able to identify him as John Blanke as there are various documents that refer to him (including a request from him to the King for a pay rise, which was successful).[6]https://www.hrp.org.uk/tower-of-london/history-and-stories/john-blanke/#gs.kq502w

The seventeenth century

British School Allegorical Painting of Two Ladies wearing Beauty Patches

This painting from about 1650 was in the news as we were writing this article. Described as ‘recently discovered’ it had been sold at auction to an overseas buyer. The British Government stepped in to temporarily delay its export in the hope that a British gallery would come forward and buy it because of the highly unusual subject matter.

‘Although not distinguished artistically’ it is described as ‘a great rarity in British art, as a mid-seventeenth-century work that depicts a black woman and a white woman with equal status.’[7]https://hyperallergic.com/699732/uk-bans-export-rare-painting-featuring-black-and-white-woman/ The presence of a black woman is intriguing, why would the anonymous artist have included her if women like her did not live around him? The figures do not look like caricatures to us, someone sat for the artist while he (or she) went about their work.

This illustration comes from a book about new methods of training horses by William Cavendish, Duke of Newcastle, first published in 1658. It shows a black groom working at Welbeck Abbey in Nottinghamshire. We include this picture because it shows

something that is often forgotten: Black and Asian people lived in the countryside as well as in big towns. Over the years they were employed in all sorts of capacities – such as grooms, coachmen, gardeners, huntsmen and farm workers. For example, there was a newspaper report in 1768 which said that ‘on Saturday afternoon, a Negro servant who was harrowing with three horses in a field at Beckenham was killed by lightning, as were also two of the horses.’ For anyone who doesn’t know, harrowing is done after ploughing to break up and smooth the surface of the soil, prior to planting.

Most of our examples will show people apparently of ‘African’ or ‘African-Caribbean’ descent. However, we have included this painting from c1672[8]York Museums Trust by Sir Peter Lely (a very high profile painter) to illustrate the Asian/Indian presence, a presence that was a direct consequence of the East India Company’s growing ‘colonisation’ of the sub-Continent from 1600 onwards. 

Lely painted many portraits for Charles II, often of his numerous mistresses. However, this is Charlotte Fitzroy, his daughter by Barbara Villiers, Duchess of Cleveland. It shows her with a young Indian pageboy who seems to be about the same age. Indian servants were not as common as African, but there were certainly a number of them around after 1600 when the East India Company was founded. Some rich people who wanted to be slightly different than the rest managed to acquire Chinese servants and you can occasionally come across pictures of them too.

(reproduced with permission of the National Portrait Gallery)
(detail)

Africans and Asians were employed indoors as well as out. They were considered a status symbol – ‘an index of rank and opulence supreme’ as one writer put it. They were dressed in expensive exotic costumes and were often painted alongside their wealthy owners – again as an indicator of wealth. For us today this is fortunate, as otherwise we would not be able to see their portraits.

Only the very rich could afford to have their portraits painted, so most servants have left no visual record of their existence. This portrait from 1682 by Pierre Mignard is of Louise de Kérouaille, Duchess of Portsmouth, one of Charles II’s many mistresses. According to the National Portrait Gallery, the little girl ‘is shown presenting precious coral, pearls and shell to the duchess to emphasise her wealth and position. The child’s dark skin also emphasises the whiteness of the duchess’s complexion.’[9]https://www.npg.org.uk/collections/search/person/mp03623/louise-de-keroualle-duchess-of-portsmouth

The eighteenth century  

This is one of a series of paintings done for Goodwood House[10]https://www.goodwood.com/visit-eat-stay/goodwood-house/the-collection/painting-collection/ by George Stubbs, again one of the most sought after (and expensive) painters of his day. He was best known for his paintings of horses. Dating from 1759 and titled ‘Shooting at Goodwood’, it includes a black groom working on a country estate, a perfect illustration of a black presence away from urban settings.

Goodwood was already famous for horse racing at the time this picture was created and the scene shows that at least one of the grooms employed at Goodwood was of African descent. According to the Goodwood website, the black servant holding the Arab horse, may either be Thomas Robinson, who came to Goodwood in the 1740s and was named after the Governor of Barbados, or a footman named Jean Baptiste, who came from one of the French colonies.

The black servant is believed to be Ottobah Cugoano

This is a 1784 engraving of a painting by Richard Cosway.[11]Reproduced with permission of The National Portrait Gallery We have included it because the black servant is believed to be Ottobah Cugoano. Along with Olaudah Equiano, Cugoano was one of the black men who campaigned vigorously against slavery. Too often the agency of blacks in achieving their own freedom is downplayed or overlooked completely.

Cugoano actually went further than Equiano in arguing for the complete abolition of slavery, by his reckoning ‘every man in Great Britain [is] responsible in some degree, for the shocking and inhuman murders and oppressions of Africans.’[12] ‘Thoughts and sentiments on the Evil and Wicked Traffic of the Slavery and Commerce of the Human Species’ , published in 1787

We make no apologies for featuring this painting of Dido Elizabeth Belle with her cousin, Lady Elizabeth Murray.[13]The painting, now attributed to David Martin, hangs at Scone Palace in Perthshire, the ancestral home of the descendants of Lord Mansfield Dido lived with her great uncle, the Lord Chief Justice of England, Lord Mansfield, on his Hampstead estate at Kenwood. Mansfield’s rulings, particularly in the case of the Zong massacre, helped to undermine the trade in enslaved people.

Much of the history we were taught in school was about white men, generally white men of a particular class (people like Lord Mansfield). Dido stands out because she was a black woman whose mother had been enslaved, thus in this painting she defies the three things that rendered so many people like her invisible, race, class and gender.

Some black women left their mark by writing about their lives, people like Mary Prince. Dido didn’t leave us a written legacy, instead we have this portrait of her dating from 1779 and, thanks to the brilliant work of a number of researchers, we know quite a lot about her life (helping us answer the ‘who?’ question). There are a number of articles about Dido on this site but if you want to learn about her you really should visit the All Things Georgian website.[14]The latest in a series of articles about Dido on All Things Georgian can be found here:https://georgianera.wordpress.com/2022/01/03/dido-elizabeth-belle-ranelagh-street-pimlico/

In art as in life, someone’s status as a GEM will not always be readily apparent. This painting, dating from 1798, depicts Nancy Graham.

Louvre, Paris

Perhaps she doesn’t look like a GEM but we picked up her story from David Alston’s excellent book ‘Slaves and Highlanders’[15]’Slaves and Highlanders’, David Alston, Edinburgh University Press, 2021 ‘Nancy was the illegitimate daughter of Francis Graham and Miss Jackson, a ‘free coloured’ woman in Jamaica …. Nancy arrived in Scotland as a young girl and had her portrait painted by the fashionable society artist, Henry Raeburn.’[16]https://www.wikiart.org/en/henry-raeburn/little-girl-holding-flowers-portrait-of-nancy-graham So, the girl in the painting may not look like a GEM but there is clear documentary proof that she had one black grandparent. 

The nineteenth century

Thanks to the work of John Ellis we now have a much better understanding of the black presence in the British Army and Navy in the late 18th and early 19th centuries. That black soldiers and sailors were present at the Battles of Waterloo and Trafalgar, key moments in British history, has been proven beyond doubt by his research into service and pension records of the time.

As you can see above, their presence at Trafalgar was reflected in the art of the day, a black sailor is shown at the thick of the action in this painting depicting the death of Nelson.[17]The Death of Nelson, painting by Samuel Drummond, Oil on canvas. H 133 X W 160 cm. The Nelson Museum, Yarmouth.https://artuk.org/discover/artworks/the-death-of-nelson-351

In this painting of 1829 we see a black woman in a different context, at work as a flower seller in London’s Hungerford Market (which stood on the site of what is now Charing Cross station) Sitting on her upturned basket, it looks as if she has completed her work for the day and is feeling rather pleased with herself. It looks as if her white companion still has a long day’s work ahead of her!

The names of the people in the painting are known as they are noted around the frame. The black man is John Dayman or Deman. He was born on St. Kitts in about 1784 and served with Nelson in the West Indies. He wasn’t actually at the Battle of Trafalgar but we know the identity of black sailors who were. Dayman spent his last years at the Greenwich Naval hospital where he died on 3rd December 1847.[18]The United Service, National Maritime Museum, Greenwish

Isabella Paula, 1834

Some paintings are more mysterious than others. Nothing is known about Isabella Paula, other than her name and that she was in York in 1834 where her portrait was painted by a famous local artist, Mary Ellen Best. It was captioned, “Isabella Paula, a Portuguese Hindoo, 1834”. It is thought that perhaps she may have been connected with a circus or travelling fair.

What does the term “Portuguese Hindoo” refer to?  Perhaps Isabella came from Goa – which was a Portuguese “overseas territory” until 1961.  Maybe she was of mixed Indian and Portuguese ancestry.  The Portuguese had settled and traded in India long before the British arrived and, just like the early British settlers, they intermarried with local women and created a large Eurasian population.

Note the beautiful patterns on Isabella Paula’s clothes.  Indian motifs like these were copied by British textile firms, especially those on the edge of her shawl and on her skirt.  This design eventually became known as “Paisley Pattern,” after the town in Scotland that mass produced it. Shawls originated in India and were introduced to Britain in the 1760s. Initially shawls were only worn by the upper classes, as they were imported from India and very expensive. However, from about 1800 to 1870 they were in daily use all over Britain. Some were patterned, some were plain but every woman wore them, rich and poor.

[19]This photograph is available from The National Portrait Gallery although we first saw it at the local studies room of Croydon library
[20]Reproduced with permission of the National Portrait Gallery

As the nineteenth century progressed photography developed to the extent that photographs also become a valuable source for recording the black presence. Apart from including young Samuel Coleridge-Taylor’s school photo (he is seated, far right), we won’t deal with photographs here. In this case our view is that the photograph is more informative about the circumstances of young Samuel’s life than the painting.

We will finish with this painting of Samuel Coleridge-Taylor as a boy in 1881.  Samuel went on to become one of the best known and most popular composers of classical music in the closing years of the nineteenth century and earliest decades on the twentieth.

Conclusion

The people in these paintings are not made up from artists’ imaginations. In a number of cases they are portrayals of named individuals and, where that is not the case, it is clear that they are based on black people that the artists would have seen around them, their features are individualised not mere ‘caricatures’. These are just examples, chosen to illustrate our point that paintings are a valuable source of social history in general terms but, more specifically, can be used to illustrate the centuries-long black presence in Britain. We hope that you will seek out such representations when you next visit a museum or gallery and would love to hear about your ‘discoveries’.

References

References
1 https://www.historycalroots.com/discovering-black-history-in-wales/
2 If you type ‘ellis’ into this site’s ‘search’ box John’s articles will come up
3 Untold Histories – Black people in England and Wales during the period of the British slave trade, c.1660-1807, Kathleen Chater, Manchester University Press, 2011
4 ’Black Tudors – the untold story’, Miranda Kaufmann, Oneworld Publication, 2017
5 ibid p.102
6 https://www.hrp.org.uk/tower-of-london/history-and-stories/john-blanke/#gs.kq502w
7 https://hyperallergic.com/699732/uk-bans-export-rare-painting-featuring-black-and-white-woman/
8 York Museums Trust
9 https://www.npg.org.uk/collections/search/person/mp03623/louise-de-keroualle-duchess-of-portsmouth
10 https://www.goodwood.com/visit-eat-stay/goodwood-house/the-collection/painting-collection/
11 Reproduced with permission of The National Portrait Gallery
12 ‘Thoughts and sentiments on the Evil and Wicked Traffic of the Slavery and Commerce of the Human Species’ , published in 1787
13 The painting, now attributed to David Martin, hangs at Scone Palace in Perthshire, the ancestral home of the descendants of Lord Mansfield
14 The latest in a series of articles about Dido on All Things Georgian can be found here:https://georgianera.wordpress.com/2022/01/03/dido-elizabeth-belle-ranelagh-street-pimlico/
15 ’Slaves and Highlanders’, David Alston, Edinburgh University Press, 2021
16 https://www.wikiart.org/en/henry-raeburn/little-girl-holding-flowers-portrait-of-nancy-graham
17 The Death of Nelson, painting by Samuel Drummond, Oil on canvas. H 133 X W 160 cm. The Nelson Museum, Yarmouth.https://artuk.org/discover/artworks/the-death-of-nelson-351
18 The United Service, National Maritime Museum, Greenwish
19 This photograph is available from The National Portrait Gallery although we first saw it at the local studies room of Croydon library
20 Reproduced with permission of the National Portrait Gallery

More about Dido Elizabeth Belle and her Mother

History is history, it happens and things move on, today’s news is tomorrow’s history – right? Well, not exactly. Whilst the basic facts may not change, what we know about them certainly does.

Dido Elizabeth Belle is a case in point.

At Historycal Roots we first became aware of her story in the 1980s when local history researchers in Camden looked into the, now famous, double portrait that hung in Kenwood House, Hampstead.

Who, they asked themselves, was the black girl in the painting?  They had found some information about her in the archives and published the story. There wasn’t a lot but, what there was, was intriguing. We kept in touch with developments in the telling of Dido’s story over the following years (and decades!)

Fast forward to 2014 and the film ‘Belle’, directed by Amma Asante and starring Gugu Mbatha-Raw in the title role, was released in the UK. Also that year, using Dido’s story as the inspiration, we wrote the first of our books for children, ‘Fern and Kate Meet Dido Elizabeth Belle’.

The book combined a short story (two modern school girls go back in time and meet Dido) with a summary of the true story of Dido’s life and the times she lived in. We did our best to get the real history accurate and read all the information we could find about her. Based on that we wrote ‘Dido’s Mother was an enslaved woman from the Caribbean’ and that she ‘might have been called Maria’. We concluded by saying ‘no one knows what happened to Maria (if that really was her name) after Dido was born but she may well have died soon after childbirth.’ We didn’t write it at the time but can remember thinking ‘and we never will know.’

Well, I didn’t bargain on the tenacity of historians and on the paper trail that marks out the course of our lives now and which marked out the lives of those who lived before us. Some very determined people have filled in many of the gaps in our knowledge of Dido and her mother.

On this site we like to add something to the work that others have done, rather than just repeat it. In the case of Dido we don’t have any fresh insights and can only share with you discoveries that others have made. In a book published recently, ‘Britain’s Black Past’, there is an article by Gretchen Gerzina which brings us up to date on Dido’s story and that of her mother. It is just one of 18 fascinating essays in the book which is a treasure trove of information, much of it new.

Looking at Gretchen Gerzina’s article about Dido we now know much more than we did just six years ago.

Dido was born in London on 29th June 1761 and was a free woman from birth. Earlier suggestions that Dido could have been born into enslavement and might have been born at sea are now known to be incorrect. The ‘birth at sea’ story seems to have originated with the descendents of Lord Mansfield but, as anyone with experience of researching family histories can attest, these traditions handed down through the generations can often be wrong.

Dido’s mother was indeed Maria Belle and, far from dying ‘soon after childbirth’, Maria lived in London for most of the period from 1761 to 1774. There is a strong likelihood therefore that Dido was able to see her mother even though they may only have lived together while Dido was an infant. It still isn’t known when Dido moved into Lord Mansfield’s household. Logic rather than any  kind of historical research suggests it could have been 1764 when Maria left London.

Dido had at least four half brothers or sisters fathered by John Lindsey with different women during his time serving in the Caribbean. John Edward, born in 1762, died young. But Ann and Elizabeth, both born in 1766 to different mothers, and John born in 1767 survived childhood. Indeed John went on to become a Colonel in the Madras Army and amassed a fortune. Dido was the only one of John Lindsey’s illegitimate offspring who was born in the UK, the others were born in Jamaica.

Maria Belle lived with Dido’s father, John Lindsey, for a time (1764-65) in Pensacola, Florida. Their address was No.6 Western Bayfront. Lindsey was commander of naval forces stationed at Pensacola (from 1763 to 1781 Florida was in British hands). Lindsey married in 1768 and, as far as anyone has been able to establish, fathered no more offspring, legitimate or otherwise.

Even though Lindsey had been married for five years Maria was clearly someone who was still in his thoughts as, in 1773, he, now Sir John Lindsay, signed a plot of land in Pensacola over to Maria who was described as ‘a negro woman of Pensacola’.

Excavations at the site of the plot of land where the house stood have even found traces of fine quality glassware and ceramics, finds that contrasted sharply with the more masculine accoutrements found at other plots nearby (things like pipe stems and bottle fragments). The evidence suggests that the occupant of No.6 was a lady with a ‘higher status life-style’ and the researcher, Margo Stringfield, suggests Maria’s tastes may reflect the life she had become accustomed to during her time in London.

More is also now known about Dido’s husband, John Daviniere, and about her life with him. Daviniere was born in the town of Ducey in the Normandy region of France. He was baptised on 16th November 1768. They married on 5th December 1793 at St George’s Hanover Square and one of the witnesses was the son of 7th Earl of Coventry which shows that Dido continued to enjoy connections with the aristocracy. You can visit the very spot where they exchanged vows:

The couple moved into a newly built house at 14, Ranelagh Street North. They had three children together, two of whom (both sons) survived into adulthood. Etienne Daly has gone to great lengths to establish where Dido’s sons (and a grandson) are buried. The excellent website ‘All Things Georgian’ has several fascinating articles about Dido and includes one that documents Etienne’s research (having spent many hours in cemeteries looking for long lost graves the account of his search sounded all too familiar) https://georgianera.wordpress.com/2020/05/20/where-are-dido-elizabeth-belles-sons-buried/

Dido herself died on 25th July 1804 and was probably buried in St George’s Field burial ground. Much of the site was excavated in modern times to build a block of flats but not all of it was and it is possible Dido is still there. At the risk of being proved wrong (again) it seems unlikely that the exact location of Dido’s final resting place will ever be identified.

I will give Gretchen Gerzina the last word. Summing up Dido’s story she has this to say: ‘the story of Dido Elizabeth Belle challenges us to rethink what we thought we knew about Britain’s black past, about women like her, and about their lives in unexpected places.’

What became of Dido Elizabeth Belle’s mother?

At Historical Roots we are so grateful to Yorkshire historian, Audrey Dewjee, for drawing our attention to dramatic new research into the story of Dido Elizabeth Belle.

Dido has been something of a fixation with us for approaching 30 years, ever since going to Camden library to get a copy of a short pamphlet that the local history society had produced about the mysterious black girl in the double portrait at Kenwood House. Gradually over the years, more snippets of information have emerged but until now, if anyone asked, we always had to say that, sadly, no one knew what had happened to Dido’s mother, Maria.

Now, thanks to fantastic work by Joanne Major, we know rather more about what became of Maria Bell. If you share even one tenth of our interest in Dido’s story you really must read Joanne’s article:

https://georgianera.wordpress.com/2018/06/26/revealing-new-information-about-dido-elizabeth-belles-siblings/

Joanne has found that John Lindsey, having fathered a number of illegitimate children, married in 1768.  But it seems that Lindsey ‘did not neglect his former lover.’ Indeed, Joanne goes on to say ‘In 1773 Lindsay began a process to transfer a piece of property he owned in Pensacola, Florida to Maria Bell, with the requirement that she build a house there. At the time, Maria Bell was living in London but a year later, when the deal was finalised, she had travelled to America. In the document, she was referred to as “a Negro woman of Pensacola, formerly of Pensacola, and then residing in London”’. This, of course, raises the tantalising thought that, if Dido’s mother lived in London for several years while her daughter was being raised in Lord Mansfield’s household at Kenwood House, might they have been in contact?

There is a great deal more of interest in Joanne’s article which is a fascinating read.

I notice that the heading of the page is ‘All Things Georgian’ and underneath it says that the site is for: ‘Super Sleuths who blog about anything and everything to do with the Georgian Era’. Well, Joanne Major definitely deserves to be regarded as a ‘super sleuth’ for casting fresh light on Dido’s story.

An Evening With Dido Elizabeth Belle

Friday 31st August saw a group of young people deliver ‘An Evening With Dido Elizabeth Belle’ at the Shoestring Theatre in Croydon.

   

The show was the end product of a boot camp they attended during their school holiday. The young cast sang, danced and acted out a school trip to Kenwood House where a young schoolgirl of mixed heritage, called Fern, came face to face with Dido Elizabeth Belle, first in the famous painting and then in the flesh as Dido came to life before her eyes.

   

The one-off performance drew a sell out crowd of seventy who gave the young cast a rousing reception at the end of the show. The youngsters (from  age seven up to sixteen) had given up two weeks of their holiday to prepare for the show, receiving coaching in the performing arts (singing, dancing and acting). Their hard work really did pay dividends and will, hopefully, have done wonders for their self-confidence (performing in front of a live audience can be a daunting experience for people of any age).

The distinguished historian Michael Ohajuru appeared in the show as himself, explaining to the school party the significance of the painting and the context surrounding it.

   

After a short interval, Michael chaired a question and answer session with the audience that featured Evadne Bygrave (CEO of Sing-a-Book and the driving force behind the show) and David Gleave (of Historycal Roots and author of the book ‘Fern and Kate Meet Dido Elizabeth Belle’ on which the show was loosely [!] based). Asked why he felt Dido’s story was important, David said: ‘I was a white boy who went to a white school where I was taught white history. I learned about Florence Nightingale, for example, but not Mary Seacole. It was only much later that I realised there was a very different and much more diverse and interesting version of history that had been left untold.’ Dido, he went on to say, had come from the most disadvantaged background imaginable but had nevertheless overcome the obstacles that confronted her to leave her unique mark on the world, something we could all draw inspiration from.

The show could hardly have been better timed because, purely by chance, a couple of days later the painting of Dido was featured in an episode of ‘Fake or Fortune?’ on the BBC. The programme told Dido’s story and explored who might have painted the famous double portrait. For many years the painting was attributed to Zoffany but, after a fascinating investigation, the artist was identified as David Martin, a highly regarded Scottish portrait painter. A value of £600,000 was put on the painting but everyone agreed that its significance as a historical document far outweighed any monetary value.

We first became aware of Dido’s story about thirty years ago when a group of local historians in Camden asked themselves questions about the mysterious Black girl in the painting at Kenwood House. We have followed developments avidly ever since and it is so satisfying to know that her story is now much more widely known. Hopefully our young actors will be among those who now have a better understanding of the rich diversity of British history.